Login
Back to Blog
EnglishComparison

Grok 3 vs Grok 4 API: What Changed and When to Upgrade

Complete comparison of Grok 3 and Grok 4 APIs — performance benchmarks, pricing differences, new capabilities, and migration guide for developers.

C
Crazyrouter Team
April 8, 2026 / 642 views
Share:
Grok 3 vs Grok 4 API: What Changed and When to Upgrade

Grok 3 vs Grok 4 API: What Changed and When to Upgrade#

xAI's Grok has gone from a Twitter novelty to a serious frontier model. Grok 4 launched in early 2026 with significant improvements over Grok 3 — but should you upgrade your integration? This guide covers everything developers need to know.

Grok 3 vs Grok 4: The Quick Summary#

FeatureGrok 3Grok 4 / Grok 4.1 Fast
ArchitectureDense transformerMoE + reasoning traces
Context Window131K tokens131K tokens
Max Output8,192 tokens16,384 tokens
Image Input✅ Enhanced
Function Calling✅ Improved
Reasoning Mode✅ (Grok 4 Heavy)
Speed~65 tok/s~95 tok/s (Grok 4.1 Fast)
MMLU Score87.5%91.2%
HumanEval (coding)71.3%79.8%
Price (Input)$5/1M$3/1M (Grok 4.1 Fast)
Price (Output)$15/1M$15/1M

What Is Grok 4?#

Grok 4 is xAI's fourth-generation language model, available in two main variants:

  1. Grok 4 — Full capability model with extended reasoning support
  2. Grok 4.1 Fast — Optimized for speed and cost, uses MoE architecture to deliver faster inference at lower cost

Both are available via the xAI API (native) and through aggregators like Crazyrouter, which provides OpenAI-compatible access to Grok 4.

Key Improvements in Grok 4#

1. Better Reasoning and Math#

Grok 4's biggest improvement is reasoning. In extended "think" mode, it approaches o3-level performance on math and logic problems. On MATH-500 (competition math):

  • Grok 3: 62.1%
  • Grok 4 (standard): 74.4%
  • Grok 4 Heavy (with thinking): 88.3%

2. Improved Code Generation#

HumanEval jumped from 71.3% → 79.8%. In practice this means:

  • Better understanding of complex algorithmic problems
  • Fewer hallucinated function signatures
  • More accurate error handling suggestions
  • Better at multi-file code refactoring

3. Faster Inference (Grok 4.1 Fast)#

Grok 4.1 Fast uses a Mixture of Experts architecture (only activating ~22B of 314B parameters per token), delivering:

  • ~95 tokens/second (vs ~65 for Grok 3)
  • ~450ms TTFT (vs ~700ms for Grok 3)
  • 40% lower input token cost

4. Better Multimodal Understanding#

Image understanding improved significantly. Grok 4 can now:

  • Read text in images (OCR)
  • Understand charts and diagrams more accurately
  • Handle multiple images in a single request
  • Process screenshots for UI analysis

Grok 4 Pricing Breakdown#

ModelInputOutputContext
Grok 3$5/1M$15/1M131K
Grok 4$8/1M$15/1M131K
Grok 4.1 Fast$3/1M$15/1M131K
Grok 4 Heavy$15/1M$60/1M131K

Via Crazyrouter:

ModelInputOutputSavings vs Official
grok-4$5.6/1M$10.5/1M~30%
grok-4-1-fast$2.1/1M$10.5/1M~30%

How to Access Grok 4 API#

Option 1: xAI Native API#

python
import anthropic  # xAI uses Anthropic-compatible SDK

client = anthropic.Anthropic(
    api_key="your-xai-api-key",
    base_url="https://api.x.ai/v1"
)

message = client.messages.create(
    model="grok-4-1-fast",
    max_tokens=1024,
    messages=[
        {"role": "user", "content": "Explain Mixture of Experts architecture"}
    ]
)

print(message.content[0].text)

Option 2: Via Crazyrouter (OpenAI-Compatible)#

python
from openai import OpenAI

# Use the same OpenAI SDK you already know
client = OpenAI(
    api_key="your-crazyrouter-key",
    base_url="https://crazyrouter.com/v1"
)

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="grok-4-1-fast",
    messages=[
        {"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."},
        {"role": "user", "content": "Write a Python function to parse JSON with error handling"}
    ],
    max_tokens=1024
)

print(response.choices[0].message.content)

Node.js Example#

javascript
import OpenAI from 'openai';

const client = new OpenAI({
  apiKey: process.env.CRAZYROUTER_API_KEY,
  baseURL: 'https://crazyrouter.com/v1',
});

async function askGrok4(question) {
  const response = await client.chat.completions.create({
    model: 'grok-4-1-fast',
    messages: [
      { role: 'user', content: question }
    ],
    temperature: 0.7,
    max_tokens: 2048,
  });
  
  return response.choices[0].message.content;
}

const answer = await askGrok4('What are the trade-offs of MoE vs dense transformer models?');
console.log(answer);

cURL#

bash
curl https://crazyrouter.com/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer your-crazyrouter-key" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "grok-4-1-fast",
    "messages": [
      {"role": "user", "content": "Write a regex for validating email addresses"}
    ],
    "temperature": 0.3,
    "max_tokens": 512
  }'

Migration Guide: Grok 3 → Grok 4#

Upgrading is mostly a model name change. However, there are a few behavioral differences to test:

1. Update Model Name#

python
# Before
model = "grok-3"

# After (choose based on needs)
model = "grok-4-1-fast"   # 40% cheaper, 50% faster
# OR
model = "grok-4"           # Best quality
# OR  
model = "grok-4-heavy"     # Maximum reasoning

2. Test Output Length#

Grok 4 supports up to 16,384 output tokens (vs 8,192 for Grok 3). If you had workarounds for long outputs, you may be able to simplify them.

3. Function Calling Format#

Grok 4 improved function calling reliability. If you had retry logic for failed function calls, test whether you can simplify it:

python
# Grok 4 is more reliable with complex tool schemas
tools = [
    {
        "type": "function",
        "function": {
            "name": "search_database",
            "description": "Search the product database",
            "parameters": {
                "type": "object",
                "properties": {
                    "query": {"type": "string"},
                    "filters": {
                        "type": "object",
                        "properties": {
                            "category": {"type": "string"},
                            "price_max": {"type": "number"}
                        }
                    }
                },
                "required": ["query"]
            }
        }
    }
]

response = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="grok-4-1-fast",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Find laptops under $1000"}],
    tools=tools,
    tool_choice="auto"
)

4. Check Real-time Web Search (Grok-specific)#

If you're using Grok's real-time X/Twitter data access features via the native xAI API, these persist in Grok 4. Via Crazyrouter, standard completions are available without real-time search unless enabled.

When Should You NOT Upgrade?#

Stay on Grok 3 if:

  • You're cost-sensitive and batch processing: Grok 4.1 Fast is actually cheaper, so this rarely applies
  • You've fine-tuned prompts carefully for Grok 3: Some prompts need retuning due to different default behavior
  • Your downstream systems parse Grok 3 output format: Test that Grok 4's slightly different formatting doesn't break parsing

Grok 4 vs Other Frontier Models#

TaskGrok 4.1 FastClaude Sonnet 4.5GPT-5 MiniGemini 2.5 Flash
Coding⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Math⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Speed⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Cost⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Reasoning⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Instruction Following⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

Grok 4.1 Fast is particularly competitive for cost-sensitive, speed-critical applications. It's not the absolute best at any single task, but its price/performance ratio is excellent.

Frequently Asked Questions#

Q: Is Grok 4 better than Claude Opus 4.6? A: For most general tasks, Claude Opus 4.6 still leads in instruction following and nuanced reasoning. Grok 4 is closer to Claude Sonnet 4.5 in overall quality but faster.

Q: Can I use Grok 4 with the OpenAI Python SDK? A: Yes, via Crazyrouter. Set base_url="https://crazyrouter.com/v1" and use model="grok-4-1-fast".

Q: Does Grok 4 have a free tier? A: Grok 4 is available free to X Premium subscribers via the Grok.com interface. API access requires an xAI developer account or a Crazyrouter subscription.

Q: What's the difference between Grok 4 and Grok 4 Heavy? A: Grok 4 Heavy enables extended thinking/reasoning mode (like o3 or Kimi K2 Thinking), making it much stronger for math, logic, and complex coding problems — at 5× the cost.

Q: Should I use Grok 4.1 Fast or Grok 4? A: For most production use cases, Grok 4.1 Fast delivers 90% of Grok 4's quality at 40% lower input cost and 50% higher speed. Use Grok 4 full when you need maximum quality.

Summary#

Grok 4 represents a meaningful upgrade over Grok 3:

  • 40% faster (Grok 4.1 Fast variant)
  • 40% cheaper on input tokens
  • Better coding (HumanEval: 71% → 80%)
  • Better reasoning (especially Grok 4 Heavy)

For developers currently on Grok 3, migrating to Grok 4.1 Fast is a no-brainer — same or better quality, faster, cheaper.

Access Grok 4 alongside 300+ other models via Crazyrouter with OpenAI-compatible API and unified billing.

Try Grok 4 API at Crazyrouter

Implementation Guides

Related Posts

Gemini Advanced vs ChatGPT Plus vs Claude Pro in 2026: Which Subscription Is Worth It?Comparison

Gemini Advanced vs ChatGPT Plus vs Claude Pro in 2026: Which Subscription Is Worth It?

"A practical Gemini Advanced review for 2026, comparing it with ChatGPT Plus and Claude Pro on coding, research, context window, and real value for developers."

Apr 18
Akool AI Voice Generator: Features, Pricing and AlternativesComparison

Akool AI Voice Generator: Features, Pricing and Alternatives

"Comprehensive review of Akool AI Voice Generator. Features, pricing breakdown, comparison with alternatives, and how to access voice AI through Crazyrouter API."

Feb 15
Claude 5 Pricing Predictions: What Sonnet 5 and Opus 5 Might Cost in 2026Comparison

Claude 5 Pricing Predictions: What Sonnet 5 and Opus 5 Might Cost in 2026

Claude 5 pricing has not been announced. Here are realistic predictions based on Anthropic's pricing history, and how to reduce costs when it launches.

Apr 16
GLM-5.2 vs Claude Fable 5: Output Budget, Reasoning Tokens, and the 0.8 Pricing AngleComparison

GLM-5.2 vs Claude Fable 5: Output Budget, Reasoning Tokens, and the 0.8 Pricing Angle

A practical Crazyrouter benchmark comparing glm-5.2 and claude-fable-5 across math, physics, and Canvas animation tasks, with a new note on glm-5.2's current 0.8 discount multiplier in Crazyrouter pricing data.

Jul 6
Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Fable 5: A Seven-Task Real API Benchmark and Production Routing NotesComparison

Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Fable 5: A Seven-Task Real API Benchmark and Production Routing Notes

A controlled comparison of Claude Opus 5 and Claude Fable 5 through the same OpenAI-compatible API, using identical prompts and parameters across math, physics, constrained reasoning, code review, strict JSON, and experimental-design tasks, with results tracked for delivery rate, content filtering, latency, token usage, and retries.

Jul 25
Kimi K3 vs Claude Opus 4.8: Graduate-Level Math, Physics, and Coding BenchmarksComparison

Kimi K3 vs Claude Opus 4.8: Graduate-Level Math, Physics, and Coding Benchmarks

On the same Crazyrouter OpenAI-compatible API, we compare kimi-k3 and claude-opus-4-8 on graduate-level Markov chain first-passage time, damped coupled-oscillator frequency response, and dependency scheduling algorithms, recording output completeness, correctness, latency, and independent verification results.

Jul 19